Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (2024)

The Apple iPhone 13 Pro first appeared in September 2021 and as befits a device in our Ultra-Premium ($800 and higher) segment, it comes packed with many attractive features. Let’s see how it did in our Battery protocol tests.

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 3095 mAh
  • 20W charger (not included)
  • 6.1-inch, 1170 x 2532, 120 Hz OLED display
  • Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 6 GB

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

Test summary

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (1)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (2)

118

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (3)

battery

110
Autonomy

Home/Office

109

221

Honor X7b

Best: Honor X7b (221)

On the go

120

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (195)

Calibrated

109

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (198)

114
Charging

Full charge

116

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (224)

Quick boost

113

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (212)

Charge up

98

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (205)

Discharge

191

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro (194)

Key performances

These key points are derived from the lab measurements during testing and do not figure into the overall score. The lab measurements, however, are used for the overall score.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (4)

2 days 5h

Battery life

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (5)

0h49

80% Charging time

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (6)

1h43

Full charging time

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (7)

3h15 autonomy

after 5-minute charge

Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (8)

Position in Global Ranking

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (9) 84th

1. Honor Magic6 Pro

157

2. Honor X9b

156

2. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)

156

4. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

152

5. Honor X7b

151

5. Oppo Find X6 Pro

151

7. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)

150

8. Honor X7a

147

8. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

147

10. Oppo Reno6 5G

146

11. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

144

12. Honor X9a

143

13. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

142

14. Honor Magic5 Pro

141

14. Oppo Reno8 5G

141

16. Asus ROG Phone 6

140

16. Sony Xperia 10 V

140

18. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

139

19. Huawei P60 Pro

138

19. Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro

138

19. Oppo A77 5G

138

19. Sony Xperia 10 IV

138

23. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

136

23. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

136

23. Samsung Galaxy M51

136

23. Vivo Y72 5G

136

23. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

136

23. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

136

23. Xiaomi 11T

136

30. Asus ROG Phone 7

135

30. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

135

30. Oppo Find X5 Lite

135

33. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

134

33. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

134

33. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

134

33. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

134

37. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

133

37. Oppo A74

133

37. Vivo Y76 5G

133

37. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

133

37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

133

37. Xiaomi 13 Ultra

133

43. Honor X8 5G

132

43. Oppo A78 5G

132

43. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G

132

43. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

132

47. Apple iPhone 15 Plus

131

47. POCO F5 Pro

131

47. Samsung Galaxy A72

131

47. Wiko Power U30

131

51. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

130

51. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

130

53. Realme GT Neo 3

129

53. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

129

53. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

129

53. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G

129

53. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

129

58. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

128

58. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

128

58. Xiaomi 13

128

61. Honor 90 Lite

127

61. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

127

61. Oppo A94 5G

127

64. Honor 70

126

64. OnePlus 10T 5G

126

64. Oppo Find X3 Neo

126

64. Xiaomi 13 Pro

126

64. Xiaomi 11T Pro

126

69. OnePlus 11

125

69. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

125

71. Nothing Phone (2)

124

72. Huawei P50 Pro

123

72. TCL 40R 5G

123

72. Xiaomi 12T Pro

123

75. OnePlus 9

122

76. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

121

76. Oppo A74 5G

121

78. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

120

78. Xiaomi 13T Pro

120

80. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

119

80. Nothing Phone(1)

119

80. Oppo A54 5G

119

80. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

119

84. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

118

84. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

118

84. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

118

84. Xiaomi 12T

118

84. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

118

89. Realme GT 2 Pro

117

89. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G

117

91. Honor X7

116

91. Honor 90

116

91. Oppo Find X5 Pro

116

91. Vivo Y20s

116

95. Apple iPhone 13

115

95. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

115

95. Realme GT 5G

115

98. Apple iPhone 15 Pro

114

98. Huawei P40 Lite

114

98. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

114

98. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

114

98. Xiaomi 13T

114

103. Apple iPhone 15

113

103. Nokia G42 5G

113

103. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

113

103. Sony Xperia 5 IV

113

107. Apple iPhone 14

112

107. Motorola Moto G62 5G

112

107. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

112

107. OnePlus 8T

112

111. Google Pixel 8 Pro

111

111. Motorola Moto G9 Power

111

111. Oppo Find X5

111

111. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

111

115. Wiko Power U20

110

116. Oppo Find X3 Lite

109

116. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

109

116. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

109

119. Honor Magic Vs

108

119. Oppo Find N2 Flip

108

119. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

108

119. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

108

123. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

107

124. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

106

125. Black Shark 5 Pro

105

125. Oppo Find X3 Pro

105

127. OnePlus 9 Pro

104

128. Google Pixel 8

103

128. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

103

128. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

103

131. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

102

131. Asus Zenfone 8

102

131. Google Pixel 7 Pro

102

134. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

101

135. OnePlus 10 Pro

100

135. POCO F4 GT

100

135. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

100

135. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

100

135. Xiaomi 12

100

140. Apple iPhone 13 mini

99

140. Realme C21

99

140. Realme C11

99

140. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

99

140. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

99

145. Google Pixel 7

98

145. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

98

145. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

98

148. Google Pixel 6

97

149. Google Pixel 7a

96

149. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

96

149. Vivo X51 5G

96

152. Honor Magic4 Pro

95

152. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

95

152. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

95

152. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

95

152. Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

95

158. Apple iPhone 12 mini

93

158. Google Pixel 5

93

158. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

93

161. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

92

162. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

90

163. Google Pixel Fold

88

163. Xiaomi Redmi 9

88

165. Sony Xperia 1 IV

87

165. TCL 406

87

167. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

84

168. Fairphone 5

83

169. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

82

169. Xiaomi Mi 11

82

171. Google Pixel 6 Pro

81

172. Xiaomi 12 Pro

76

173. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

75

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (10)

Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (11) 20th

1. Honor Magic6 Pro

157

2. Oppo Find X6 Pro

151

3. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

142

4. Honor Magic5 Pro

141

5. Asus ROG Phone 6

140

6. Huawei P60 Pro

138

7. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

136

8. Asus ROG Phone 7

135

9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

134

9. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

134

11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

133

11. Xiaomi 13 Ultra

133

13. Apple iPhone 15 Plus

131

14. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

130

15. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

128

16. Xiaomi 13 Pro

126

17. Huawei P50 Pro

123

18. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

121

19. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

119

20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

118

21. Oppo Find X5 Pro

116

22. Apple iPhone 15 Pro

114

22. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

114

24. Sony Xperia 5 IV

113

25. Google Pixel 8 Pro

111

25. Oppo Find X5

111

25. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

111

28. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

109

29. Honor Magic Vs

108

29. Oppo Find N2 Flip

108

29. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

108

32. Oppo Find X3 Pro

105

33. OnePlus 9 Pro

104

34. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

103

34. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

103

36. Google Pixel 7 Pro

102

37. OnePlus 10 Pro

100

38. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

99

38. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

99

40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

98

41. Honor Magic4 Pro

95

41. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

95

41. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

95

44. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

93

45. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

92

46. Google Pixel Fold

88

47. Sony Xperia 1 IV

87

48. Google Pixel 6 Pro

81

49. Xiaomi 12 Pro

76

Pros

  • More than 2 days of autonomy with moderate use
  • Very well-optimized device
  • Very low consumption when streaming music and video

Cons

  • Low autonomy when using camera on the go
  • Poor charge up efficiency

Among the Ultra-Premium devices compared in this review, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro has the smallest battery capacity (3095 mAh), but it nevertheless achieved a higher overall score than its two rivals, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (5000 mAh) and the OnePlus 9 Pro (4500 mAh), though it did not beat the larger iPhone 13 Pro Max. The table below shows the battery capacity, tested charger, display type and resolution, and processor specifications for all four devices.

Apple iPhone 13 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)Apple iPhone 13 Pro MaxOnePlus 9 Pro
Battery3095 mAh5000 mAh4352 mAh4500 mAh
Charger

Wireless

20W (not included)

15W

25W (not included)

15W

20W (not included)

15W

65W

50W

Display typeOLEDOLEDOLEDOLED
Resolution1170 x 25321440 x 32001284 x 27781440 x 3216
ProcessorApple A15 Bionic 5 nmQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 5 nmApple A15 Bionic 5 nmQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 5 nm

Autonomy (60)

How long a battery charge lasts depends not only on battery capacity but also on other aspects of the phone’s hardware and software. The DXOMARK Battery autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: (1) Stationary, (2) On the go, and (3) Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (12)

77h

Light Usage

Active: 2h30/day

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (13)

53h

Moderate Usage

Active: 4h/day

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (14)

33h

Intense Usage

Active: 7h/day

With almost 30% less battery capacity, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro does not perform as well as the iPhone 13 Pro Max during our autonomy tests.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (15)

Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (16) 95th

1. Honor X7b

95h

2. Honor X7a

86h

3. Vivo Y72 5G

85h

4. Honor Magic6 Pro

81h

5. Wiko Power U30

80h

6. Sony Xperia 10 IV

80h

7. Honor X9b

77h

7. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)

77h

9. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)

77h

10. Oppo A77 5G

76h

11. Sony Xperia 10 V

75h

12. Honor X8 5G

74h

13. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

74h

14. Samsung Galaxy M51

73h

15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

72h

16. Asus ROG Phone 6

72h

17. Asus ROG Phone 7

72h

18. Honor X9a

72h

19. Wiko Power U20

71h

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

70h

21. Oppo A78 5G

70h

22. Vivo Y20s

69h

23. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

69h

24. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

69h

25. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

69h

26. Samsung Galaxy A72

69h

27. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

68h

28. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

67h

29. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

67h

30. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G

67h

31. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

66h

32. Honor Magic5 Pro

65h

33. Motorola Moto G62 5G

65h

34. Honor X7

65h

35. TCL 40R 5G

65h

36. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

65h

37. Oppo A54 5G

65h

38. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

65h

39. Nokia G42 5G

64h

40. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

64h

41. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

64h

42. Vivo Y76 5G

64h

43. Oppo Find X6 Pro

64h

44. Oppo A74

64h

45. Apple iPhone 15 Plus

64h

46. Motorola Moto G9 Power

64h

47. Oppo A74 5G

63h

48. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

63h

49. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

62h

50. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G

62h

51. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

62h

52. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

61h

53. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

61h

54. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

61h

55. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

60h

56. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

60h

57. Xiaomi 13 Pro

60h

58. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

60h

59. Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro

60h

60. Honor 90 Lite

60h

61. Xiaomi 11T

59h

62. TCL 406

59h

63. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

59h

64. Realme C11

59h

65. POCO F5 Pro

59h

66. Honor 70

58h

67. Oppo Find X5 Lite

58h

68. Oppo A94 5G

58h

69. Oppo Reno8 5G

58h

70. Huawei P60 Pro

57h

71. Realme C21

57h

72. Oppo Reno6 5G

57h

73. Sony Xperia 5 IV

57h

74. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

57h

75. Honor 90

57h

76. Xiaomi 11T Pro

57h

77. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

56h

78. Xiaomi 13 Ultra

56h

79. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

56h

80. OnePlus 10T 5G

55h

81. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G

55h

82. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

55h

83. Nothing Phone (2)

55h

84. Google Pixel 8 Pro

55h

85. Google Pixel 7a

55h

86. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

54h

87. Nothing Phone(1)

54h

88. OnePlus 9

54h

89. Xiaomi 13T

54h

90. Xiaomi 13

54h

91. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

54h

92. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

54h

93. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

54h

94. Xiaomi 12T Pro

54h

95. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

53h

96. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

53h

97. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

53h

98. Honor Magic Vs

53h

99. Apple iPhone 14

53h

100. Apple iPhone 13

52h

101. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

52h

102. OnePlus 11

52h

103. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

52h

104. Xiaomi 13T Pro

52h

105. Realme GT Neo 3

52h

106. Xiaomi 12T

52h

107. Google Pixel 7 Pro

52h

108. Realme GT 5G

52h

109. Huawei P50 Pro

51h

110. Oppo Find X3 Neo

51h

111. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

51h

112. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

51h

114. Apple iPhone 15

51h

115. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

51h

116. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

50h

117. Google Pixel 6a

50h

118. Huawei P40 Lite

50h

119. Realme GT 2 Pro

50h

120. Xiaomi Redmi 9

50h

121. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

50h

122. Oppo Find N2 Flip

49h

123. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

49h

124. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

49h

125. Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

49h

126. Oppo Find X5 Pro

49h

127. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

49h

128. Google Pixel 7

49h

129. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

49h

130. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

49h

131. Google Pixel 8

49h

132. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

133. Google Pixel 6

48h

134. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

135. Oppo Find X5

48h

136. Google Pixel Fold

47h

137. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

47h

138. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

47h

139. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

47h

140. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

47h

141. Sony Xperia 1 IV

47h

142. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

46h

143. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

46h

144. Oppo Find X3 Lite

46h

145. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

46h

146. Xiaomi 12

45h

147. OnePlus 8T

45h

148. Asus Zenfone 8

45h

149. Google Pixel 5

44h

150. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

44h

151. Oppo Find X3 Pro

44h

152. OnePlus 10 Pro

43h

153. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

43h

154. OnePlus 9 Pro

43h

155. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

43h

156. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

42h

157. Google Pixel 6 Pro

41h

158. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

41h

159. Black Shark 5 Pro

41h

160. Apple iPhone 13 mini

41h

161. Apple iPhone 12 mini

40h

162. POCO F4 GT

40h

163. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

40h

164. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

39h

165. Honor Magic4 Pro

39h

166. Vivo X51 5G

38h

167. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

38h

168. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

38h

169. Fairphone 5

37h

170. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

37h

171. Xiaomi Mi 11

36h

172. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

35h

173. Xiaomi 12 Pro

34h

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (17)

Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (18) 21st

1. Honor Magic6 Pro

81h

2. Asus ROG Phone 6

72h

3. Asus ROG Phone 7

72h

4. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

69h

5. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

68h

6. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

67h

7. Honor Magic5 Pro

65h

8. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

65h

9. Oppo Find X6 Pro

64h

10. Apple iPhone 15 Plus

64h

11. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

63h

12. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

61h

13. Xiaomi 13 Pro

60h

14. Huawei P60 Pro

57h

15. Sony Xperia 5 IV

57h

16. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

56h

17. Xiaomi 13 Ultra

56h

18. Google Pixel 8 Pro

55h

19. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

54h

20. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

54h

21. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

53h

22. Honor Magic Vs

53h

23. Google Pixel 7 Pro

52h

24. Huawei P50 Pro

51h

25. Apple iPhone 15 Pro

51h

26. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

50h

27. Oppo Find N2 Flip

49h

28. Oppo Find X5 Pro

49h

29. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

49h

30. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

49h

31. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

32. Oppo Find X5

48h

33. Google Pixel Fold

47h

34. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

47h

35. Sony Xperia 1 IV

47h

36. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

46h

37. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

44h

38. Oppo Find X3 Pro

44h

39. OnePlus 10 Pro

43h

40. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

43h

41. OnePlus 9 Pro

43h

42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

43h

43. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

42h

44. Google Pixel 6 Pro

41h

45. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

41h

46. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

40h

47. Honor Magic4 Pro

39h

48. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

38h

49. Xiaomi 12 Pro

34h

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (19)

Stationary

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

64

104

Vivo Y72 5G

Best: Vivo Y72 5G (104)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

While both Apple devices came in ahead of the Samsung and OnePlus devices in our TUS tests, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro lasted 59 hours 5 minutes in our TUS tests, which is 12 hours 15 minutes less than the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Both iPhones lost only 1% of battery during the night, which is also better than the competition.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (20)

On the go

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

63

96

Samsung Galaxy M51

Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (96)

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outside and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary for each device.

The Apple iPhone 13 Pro puts in a better-than-average performance than Ultra-Premium devices in almost all use cases during our On the go tests. Its weak point is autonomy when using the camera, which is considerably lower than that of its rivals.

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (21)

Calibrated

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

59

100

Samsung Galaxy M51

Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (100)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

The iPhone 13 Pro showed good results when streaming music and videos, considerably higher autonomy than the OnePlus 9 Pro. However, it had poor autonomy when gaming and in 3G calling, where its rival Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) did much better. That all said, with the exception of 3G calling, the larger iPhone 13 Pro Max has the best autonomy for all calibrated tests in this segment.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging (78)

The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, Full charge and Quick boost. Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long it takes to charge a battery from zero to 80% capacity and from 80% to 100%; and measure how long and how much power the battery takes to go from an indicated 100% to an actual full charge. With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (22)

Wired

57%

in 30 min

0h49

0 - 80%

1h43

Full charge

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (23)

Wireless

36%

in 30 min

1h22

0 - 80%

2h08

Full charge

The iPhone 13 Pro can use a 20W charger that allows it to fully charge its battery faster than the iPhone 13 Pro Max (which has a bigger battery capacity), but it is far behind the OnePlus 9 Pro’s 65W charging performance.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (24)

Full charge

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

80

121

Black Shark 5 Pro

Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (121)

  • Wired
  • Wireless

Power consumption and battery level during full charge

Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge

The iPhone 13 Pro needs 1 hour 34 minutes to arrive at a 100% charge showing on the battery level indicator, and an additional 9 more minutes to get its 3095 mAh battery completely charged. This is 28 minutes faster than the iPhone 13 Pro Max, which has a bigger battery capacity of 4352 mAh.

As for wireless charging, iPhone 13 Pro needs 1 hour 54 minutes to fully charge its battery, which is almost same performance as Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (1 hour 57 minutes) and 33 minutes faster than the iPhone 13 Pro Max (2 hour 27 minutes).

However, the OnePlus 9 Pro is the clear winner in this competition, as its 65W wired charger powers up the 4500 mAh battery in only 53 minutes, and whose 50W wireless charger lets it fully charge in 58 minutes.

  • Wired
  • Wireless

Time to full charge

Time to full charge

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (29)

Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (30) 95th

1. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

0h08

2. Black Shark 5 Pro

0h13

3. Realme GT Neo 3

0h14

4. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

0h14

5. OnePlus 10T 5G

0h16

6. POCO F4 GT

0h17

7. OnePlus 11

0h18

8. Xiaomi 11T Pro

0h18

9. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

0h19

10. Oppo Reno8 5G

0h21

11. Realme GT 5G

0h21

12. Xiaomi 12 Pro

0h21

13. OnePlus 9

0h21

14. Oppo Reno6 5G

0h22

15. Xiaomi 12T Pro

0h22

16. OnePlus 9 Pro

0h22

17. Honor Magic4 Pro

0h22

18. Oppo Find X5 Lite

0h22

19. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

0h22

20. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

0h22

21. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

0h22

22. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

0h23

23. Oppo Find X3 Pro

0h23

24. Oppo Find X3 Neo

0h23

25. Xiaomi 13 Pro

0h23

26. Oppo Find X5 Pro

0h23

27. Oppo Find X6 Pro

0h24

28. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G

0h24

29. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

0h24

30. Oppo Find X5

0h25

31. OnePlus 8T

0h25

32. Xiaomi 12T

0h25

33. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

0h25

34. Oppo Find X3 Lite

0h26

35. Realme GT 2 Pro

0h26

36. OnePlus 10 Pro

0h26

37. Xiaomi 12

0h27

38. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

0h28

39. Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro

0h28

40. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

0h28

41. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

0h28

42. Xiaomi 13

0h29

43. Honor Magic6 Pro

0h29

44. Huawei P60 Pro

0h29

45. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

0h29

46. Xiaomi 13 Ultra

0h29

47. Honor Magic Vs

0h29

48. Xiaomi 13T Pro

0h30

49. Xiaomi 11T

0h30

50. Huawei P50 Pro

0h30

51. Xiaomi Mi 11

0h31

52. POCO F5 Pro

0h32

53. Honor 70

0h32

54. Nothing Phone (2)

0h32

55. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

0h33

56. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

0h34

57. Huawei P40 Lite

0h34

58. Asus ROG Phone 6

0h35

59. Xiaomi 13T

0h35

60. Honor 90

0h35

61. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h37

62. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

0h37

63. Honor Magic5 Pro

0h37

64. Asus ROG Phone 7

0h37

65. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

0h37

66. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

0h38

67. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

0h38

68. Oppo A94 5G

0h39

69. Vivo Y76 5G

0h39

70. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h39

71. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

0h40

72. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

0h40

73. Vivo X51 5G

0h41

74. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

0h42

75. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

0h42

76. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

0h43

77. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

0h43

78. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

0h43

79. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

0h44

80. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G

0h44

81. Oppo Find N2 Flip

0h45

82. Asus Zenfone 8

0h45

83. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

0h46

84. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

0h46

85. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)

0h47

85. Nothing Phone(1)

0h47

87. Google Pixel 8

0h48

88. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

0h48

89. Oppo A74

0h48

90. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

0h48

91. Google Pixel 8 Pro

0h49

92. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

0h49

93. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

0h49

94. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

0h49

95. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

0h49

96. Oppo A78 5G

0h49

97. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

0h49

98. Oppo A77 5G

0h50

99. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

0h50

99. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

0h50

101. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

0h51

102. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

0h51

103. Honor 90 Lite

0h51

104. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

0h51

104. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

0h51

106. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

0h51

107. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

0h52

108. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

0h52

109. Apple iPhone 12 mini

0h52

110. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

0h52

111. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

0h52

112. Honor X9a

0h53

113. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

0h53

114. Apple iPhone 15 Pro

0h54

115. Apple iPhone 14

0h54

116. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

0h54

116. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

0h54

118. Apple iPhone 15 Plus

0h54

119. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

0h55

120. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

0h56

121. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

0h56

122. Honor X9b

0h56

122. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)

0h56

124. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

0h57

125. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

0h57

126. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

0h57

127. Apple iPhone 13 mini

0h57

128. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

0h57

129. Samsung Galaxy A72

0h58

130. Apple iPhone 13

0h58

131. Google Pixel 7

1h00

132. Google Pixel Fold

1h00

133. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

1h01

134. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

1h01

135. Honor X8 5G

1h02

136. Apple iPhone 15

1h02

137. Google Pixel 6 Pro

1h02

138. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

1h03

138. Google Pixel 6

1h03

140. Google Pixel 7 Pro

1h03

141. Honor X7

1h05

142. Sony Xperia 1 IV

1h05

143. Sony Xperia 5 IV

1h05

144. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

1h06

145. Fairphone 5

1h07

146. Google Pixel 7a

1h07

147. Honor X7b

1h08

148. Honor X7a

1h10

149. Google Pixel 6a

1h11

150. Google Pixel 5

1h14

151. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

1h15

152. Vivo Y72 5G

1h18

153. Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

1h20

154. Oppo A74 5G

1h21

155. Sony Xperia 10 V

1h22

156. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

1h22

157. Samsung Galaxy M51

1h23

158. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

1h25

159. TCL 40R 5G

1h25

160. Vivo Y20s

1h25

161. Motorola Moto G62 5G

1h26

162. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G

1h28

163. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

1h30

164. Nokia G42 5G

1h33

165. Sony Xperia 10 IV

1h45

166. Wiko Power U30

1h47

167. Realme C21

1h50

168. Oppo A54 5G

1h51

169. Xiaomi Redmi 9

1h52

170. Motorola Moto G9 Power

1h53

171. Realme C11

1h56

172. TCL 406

2h02

173. Wiko Power U20

2h22

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (31)

Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (32) 31st

1. Xiaomi 12 Pro

0h21

2. Honor Magic4 Pro

0h22

3. OnePlus 9 Pro

0h22

4. Oppo Find X3 Pro

0h23

5. Xiaomi 13 Pro

0h23

6. Oppo Find X5 Pro

0h23

7. Oppo Find X6 Pro

0h24

8. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

0h24

9. Oppo Find X5

0h25

10. OnePlus 10 Pro

0h26

11. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

0h28

12. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

0h28

13. Honor Magic6 Pro

0h29

14. Huawei P60 Pro

0h29

15. Xiaomi 13 Ultra

0h29

16. Honor Magic Vs

0h29

17. Huawei P50 Pro

0h30

18. Asus ROG Phone 6

0h35

19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h37

20. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

0h37

21. Honor Magic5 Pro

0h37

22. Asus ROG Phone 7

0h37

23. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

0h37

24. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

0h38

25. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h39

26. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

0h40

27. Oppo Find N2 Flip

0h45

28. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

0h46

29. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

0h48

30. Google Pixel 8 Pro

0h49

31. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

0h49

32. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

0h51

33. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

0h51

34. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

0h52

35. Apple iPhone 15 Pro

0h54

36. Apple iPhone 15 Plus

0h54

37. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

0h56

38. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

0h56

39. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

0h57

40. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

0h57

41. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

0h57

42. Google Pixel Fold

1h00

43. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

1h01

44. Google Pixel 6 Pro

1h02

45. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

1h03

46. Google Pixel 7 Pro

1h03

47. Sony Xperia 1 IV

1h05

48. Sony Xperia 5 IV

1h05

49. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

1h06

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (33)

Quick boost

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

73

111

Realme GT Neo 3

Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (111)

By plugging in the iPhone 13 Pro smartphone for 5 minutes with less than 50% of battery charge remaining, users will gain 3 hours 30 minutes of autonomy. This is better than both the Samsung and the 13 Pro Max, but far behind OnePlus 9 Pro, which gains 5 hours 30 minutes with a quick boost charge.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max OnePlus 9 Pro
Autonomy boost (hh:mm) 20%3:36 3:24 3:11 5:35
40%3:29 3:22 3:18 5:07
60%2:22 2:54 3:02 4:15
80%1:12 2:11 1:35 2:48
Percentage boost 20%9.8 %9.2 %6.3 %18.7 %
40%9.4 %9.1 %6.5 %17.2 %
60%6.4 %7.8 %6 %14.2 %
80%3.3 %5.9 %3.1 %9.4 %
Energy consumed 20%1723 mWh2279 mWh1621 mWh4096 mWh
40%1665 mWh2262 mWh1678 mWh3764 mWh
60%1135 mWh1950 mWh1545 mWh3118 mWh
80%576 mWh1468 mWh802 mWh2057 mWh

Efficiency (102)

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario testing, outdoor mobility testing, charging evaluation, and power measurements, and then take into consideration the device’s battery capacity.

The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a poor charge up efficiency but excellent control of current discharge.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (34)

Charge up

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

60

105

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (105)

Although the iPhone 13 Pro comes with an efficient charger, its overall charging system is not very efficient at 67.9% — lower than the S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) at 78.8% and the OnePlus 9 Pro at 89.5%.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (35)

Discharge

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

121

Highest Score

By contrast to charge up efficiency, the iPhone 13 Pro is a very well-designed device that shows low consumption during all uses — and in fact, it has the lowest discharge current in our database for WiFi video streaming and video playback.

Conclusion

The iPhone 13 Pro is a very well-optimized device, offering more than 2 days of autonomy with moderate use.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Battery review: Highly efficient device (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Errol Quitzon

Last Updated:

Views: 6327

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (79 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Errol Quitzon

Birthday: 1993-04-02

Address: 70604 Haley Lane, Port Weldonside, TN 99233-0942

Phone: +9665282866296

Job: Product Retail Agent

Hobby: Computer programming, Horseback riding, Hooping, Dance, Ice skating, Backpacking, Rafting

Introduction: My name is Errol Quitzon, I am a fair, cute, fancy, clean, attractive, sparkling, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.